Only members with restricted access (ie. academics, asset owners, government and regulatory, independent advisers/trustees and sponsoring employers) can view this article. Please login or join to view.

Measuring the effectiveness of ESG-labelled bonds can be a challenge, particularly with 'outcome bonds', which have specific environmental or social goals but lack standardised assessment criteria.

To mitigate risks such as greenwashing, investors need a systematic approach to assessing these bonds. A case study of a rainforest reforestation project illustrates such an approach and highlights the importance of thoroughly evaluating both economic returns and environmental impacts to ensure credible, effective investments.

Learn more here

Phone:
Finance: 01234 388845
Events: 0330 223 6152

Email:
Event enquiries
Finance enquiries
General enquiries
Membership enquiries
Press enquiries
Training enquiries

Address:
11 Phillips Close
Headley
Hampshire
GU35 8LY

Pensions for Purpose acts as an information centre only. We do not endorse any content published on this website that originated from one of our members. For more information, please see the website terms of use

Sign up to our newsletters

Sign up to receive email updates, including newsletters, event invitations, research briefings, and policy or community news. You can update your preferences at any time.

Email address

First name

Last name

Company name

Required fields

We handle your data with care. See our privacy policies for full details.

Website Terms | Acceptable Use Policy and Content Rules | Privacy and Cookies Policy

Outcome bonds: seeing the wood for the trees on greenwashing risk – AllianceBernstein

Will outcome bonds deliver on their promise? A systematic approach helps investors decide.

Only members with restricted access (ie. academics, asset owners, government and regulatory, independent advisers/trustees and sponsoring employers) can view this article. Please login or join to view.

Sign up to our newsletters