The Paris alignment paradox: scoping out solutions – Storebrand Asset Management

Despite their laudable aims to avoid counterintuitive results prevent greenwashing and reallocate capital towards climate-friendly investments and the inclusion of Scope 3 data provides a sub-optimal indication of portfolio climate risk exposure and causes perverse allocation decisions by investors.

Only members with restricted access (ie. academics, asset owners, government and regulatory, independent advisers/trustees and sponsoring employers) can view this article. Please login or join to view.

... In this paper, Storebrand Asset Management delve deeper into the Scope 3 category and accounting framework, to illustrate why new regulatory requirements aimed at 'Paris alignment' are leading to perverse allocation consequences for investors. They offer a solution to this industry-wide problem which they believe better aligns investors with the transition to a low carbon economy.

To the extent that anything on this website constitutes a financial promotion it is exempt from the general prohibition in S21 of FSMA on the basis that the site is only intended for investment professionals as such term is defined in S19 of the Financial Promotions Order. Please note that Pensions for Purpose does not provide consultancy services, advice or personal recommendations on any of the investment opportunities mentioned on the platform. We curate content written by members and do not endorse any underlying funds.

Learn more here